Skip to content
/ALMANAC

Unspoken Incentives: Architecting for the Elephant

Last revised

What people say they want and what their circumstances reward are not always the same.

This gap matters when designing a product, shaping a team, or trying to understand my own choices. Stated reasons are often sincere, but they may be incomplete. Status, safety, belonging, autonomy, money, and recognition can influence behaviour without appearing in the official explanation.

The point is not to reduce every human motive to self-interest. That would replace one convenient story with another. The more useful practice is to remain curious about the incentives beneath the words.

In a team, agreement on a goal does not guarantee agreement on what success means. One person may value creative freedom, another stability, and another visible responsibility. If those needs remain unspoken, commitment can weaken even when everyone continues to endorse the same plan.

Products face a similar test. A useful product may also help someone feel capable, respected, secure, or connected. Ignoring that dimension can make an otherwise sound design difficult to adopt. Exploiting it, however, is not the answer. The task is to understand the whole person without manipulating them.

I find it helpful to ask two questions: What reason are we comfortable stating? What else might this choice reward or protect?

The answers are rarely complete, but the conversation becomes more honest.

Use this workExplore with AI

Explore this journal

Take this work into your preferred AI system. Choose a ready-made prompt or add your own context. Nothing you enter here is sent or saved by utpalmv.com.

Use the work as a thinking lens without adding personal context.